On 7/5/07, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sanka Samaranayake wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Does anyone object to change GroupId of Axiom from > org.apache.ws.commons.axiom to org.apache.axiom which IMHO more appropriate Is there a particular reason why we need to do this? I think it is better to have it like what we have now as it reflects our Axiom project site and the parent project. Unlike Axis2, Axiom is *within* commons project. So don't you think the id should reflect it? I don't think the id matter a lot but do we really need to change another thing??
The maven naming convention[1] requires a groupId which mimics the package name. Therefore I believe that org.apache.axiom would be more appropriate since it mimics the actual axiom package name ( org.apache.axiom.*) [1] http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html Thanks, Sanka Chinthaka
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGjRwMjON2uBzUhh8RAhCUAJ4vENAwGMkk6j55owc9azq0klEiHQCgsYCy 8pN2lwYZZrGJ7FkJ/lA26Rk= =f03x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sanka Samaranayake WSO2 Inc. http://www.bloglines.com/blog/sanka http://www.wso2.org/