-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 +1.
What are we gonna gain from this? Even now we have inconsistencies with XmlSchema packaging and Axiom, as Sanka pointed out and we can debate for months on which one is correct. Think about what we gonna gain vs the effect of these changes. Asankha is some one who really will be affected with this change from Synapse pov. If the users don't need it, why bother? Just my 2 cents. Thanks, Chinthaka Asankha C. Perera wrote: > Sanka > > I agree with Chinthaka, and changing the group ID's will create > confusions and require many projects down the line to change their > POMs.. I think this is an unwanted overhead right now and will not give > anyone any measurable benefit for being 'maven guidelines compatible' - > enough projects violate these guidelines already in the maven world! and > this is only something you notice when dealing with maven.. when talking > about violations, I do not see the Axiom 1.0 releases on the maven > repo's anymore and I think thats a stronger violation as somehow this > artifacts are lost? > > I think its more important to remember this as a lesson and make sure we > pick the correct names when we start a new project in future or when we > move a project into maven or maven2. Axiom 1.0 was released with a > group id of "ws-commons" and it was changed to > "org.apache.ws.commons.axiom" later.. so I don't see any point of > changing this yet again.. > > asankha > > Sanka Samaranayake wrote: >> On 7/5/07, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > Sanka Samaranayake wrote: >> Hello Everyone, > >> Does anyone object to change GroupId of Axiom from >> org.apache.ws.commons.axiom to org.apache.axiom which IMHO more > appropriate > > Is there a particular reason why we need to do this? I think it is > better to have it like what we have now as it reflects our Axiom project > site and the parent project. > > Unlike Axis2, Axiom is *within* commons project. So don't you think the > id should reflect it? > > I don't think the id matter a lot but do we really need to change > another thing?? >>> >>> >>> >>> The maven naming convention[1] requires a groupId which mimics the >>> package >>> name. Therefore I believe that org.apache.axiom would be more appropriate >>> since it mimics the actual axiom package name ( org.apache.axiom.*) >>> >>> >>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sanka >>> >>> >>> Chinthaka >>> - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGjdvLjON2uBzUhh8RAihYAKCOvwCTIbQ4brBu1v7+kCMgWQbvBgCfQ2ng jDyvYMjwTqPXr5Gx5TftYIY= =uQRE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
