We've had this debate before :) Can we just stick to what we have please? and change it when get shoot for 1.5/2.0?
thanks, dims On 7/6/07, Sanka Samaranayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/5/07, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sanka Samaranayake wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > Does anyone object to change GroupId of Axiom from > > org.apache.ws.commons.axiom to org.apache.axiom which IMHO more > appropriate > > Is there a particular reason why we need to do this? I think it is > better to have it like what we have now as it reflects our Axiom project > site and the parent project. > > Unlike Axis2, Axiom is *within* commons project. So don't you think the > id should reflect it? > > I don't think the id matter a lot but do we really need to change > another thing?? The maven naming convention[1] requires a groupId which mimics the package name. Therefore I believe that org.apache.axiom would be more appropriate since it mimics the actual axiom package name ( org.apache.axiom.*) [1] http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html Thanks, Sanka Chinthaka > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGjRwMjON2uBzUhh8RAhCUAJ4vENAwGMkk6j55owc9azq0klEiHQCgsYCy > 8pN2lwYZZrGJ7FkJ/lA26Rk= > =f03x > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Sanka Samaranayake WSO2 Inc. http://www.bloglines.com/blog/sanka http://www.wso2.org/
-- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
