2009/1/20 Howard Cheng <[email protected]>: > I don't see why. The faster the better IMHO.
Just in case an edit is not vandalism or at least not entirely. A new user wanting to add a comment and accidentally blanking the page should of course be reverted, but the comment should also be implemented in the page. The bot couldn't do that, it would just revert the edit. Regards, ChrisiPK 2009/1/20 Howard Cheng <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:51 AM, ChrisiPK <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Well, if we are to activate a bot, I would like to see a proper >> waiting time before suspected vandalism is reverted. An hour or so >> would be nice. That leaves people enough time to act, which is always >> better than just an automated bot reverting everything. >> >> Regards, >> >> ChrisiPK >> > > I don't see why. The faster the better IMHO. > > -h > > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l > > _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
