On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Krinkle <[email protected]> wrote: > Op 29 okt 2010, om 14:51 heeft Magnus Manske het volgende geschreven: > >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Bryan Tong Minh >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Krinkle <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> For one, tags would not be hierarchical and not stored under a name, >>>> rather a number (an id if you will). >>> >>> I would store the tag-i18n definitions in a separate Tag: namespace. >>> Then you don't need to create the history tracking etc. all by >>> yourself. You will need a unique identifier though, but I don't see a >>> problem making the unique identifier equal to the content language. >> >> As to "tracking", IMHO it would suffice to just add [[Tag:XYZ]] to the >> pages; that's rather inelegant from a database POV, but as Bryan >> points out, it would take care of version tracking etc. All one would >> need to do is to remove them from the rendering and display them >> separately, like categories. > > @Bryan: Ah, excuse me. You were referring to the history of the File- > page. > I was under the impression it was about the version tracking of the > Tags. > Yeah, adding to the page would be similar to categories and extracted > from wikitext > to a taglinks table. > No you were right, I was refering to the history in the Tag namespace, but history tracking equally applies to the use of tags on file pages as well.
Bryan _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
