Is hard-wiring the numbers really a good idea as opposed to a percentage
(of something or the other)?
Just thinking of a way to fix the quorum even if active membership were
to double in a year or two.
Dewole.
On 28/09/2016 07:58, Alan Barrett wrote:
On 26 Sep 2016, at 22:00, Alan Barrett <alan.barr...@afrinic.net> wrote:
On 26 Sep 2016, at 18:22, Douglas Onyango <ondoug...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alan,
The current quorum requirement is 10 members, which is too small, but I think
10% is too large.
Perhaps AFRINIC can share with us statistics on member attendance in
the past 5 years. We can normalize this data and can use something
like the lowest or average number of members present to prescribe a
pragmatic number for our quorum requirement.
Sure, I can get those numbers.
Here are the number of votes cast during recent Board elections. The number of
on-site votes gives a good idea of the number of members who attended the
meetings.
2013 2014 2015 2016
E-Votes 58 59 49 183
On-Site Votes 45 66 77 62
TOTAL 103 125 126 245
Given these attendance figures, I suggest a quorum requirement of 30 resource
members in the future.
Alan
_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
