I would support that change. Owen
> On Nov 5, 2016, at 03:36 , Alan Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 5 Nov 2016, at 00:46, Andrew Alston <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Alan, >> >> I believe Point 5 may result in conflict with Article 13.4 that states that >> directors represent specific regions. For consistency 13.4 would also need >> modification. > > Perhaps we should change 13.4 to say that the Directors in seats 1 to 6 > should “reside in”, not “represent”, the six sub-regions. > > Historically, we have had Directors who changed their place of residence > after being elected, such that they no longer resided in the relevant > sub-region, but they did not resign. > >> I believe that section 16 is also in conflict with the companies act. The >> companies act specifically states that a director may only be removed in a >> meeting dedicated to that purpose with that being the only item on the >> agenda. So while I have no problem with the community being able to recall >> a director, it must be through a dedicated meeting and not through the >> addition of an agenda item at a regular meeting. > > I’ll check on that, and make a suitable chaneg if necessary. > > Alan Barrett > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
