> On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Alan Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 5 Nov 2016, at 16:06, Alan Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 5 Nov 2016, at 00:46, Andrew Alston <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> I believe that section 16 is also in conflict with the companies act. The >>> companies act specifically states that a director may only be removed in a >>> meeting dedicated to that purpose with that being the only item on the >>> agenda. So while I have no problem with the community being able to recall >>> a director, it must be through a dedicated meeting and not through the >>> addition of an agenda item at a regular meeting. >> >> I’ll check on that, and make a suitable chaneg if necessary. > > By my reading, the Companies Act article 138 gives some methods that a > Director may be removed, but does not prevent the Bylaws/Constitution from > providing other methods.
Only methods which are in accordance with the Act if we still think we are only governed by the Act. —Alain > > Alan Barrett > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
