On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 6:33 PM Erick Joshua Lagon <[email protected]> wrote:
> The implementation of the resource transfer policy ( > https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d4#details) would > enable AFRINIC to reduce the risks in case their situation goes sideways. > That resource transfer policy is under two appeals [1] [2] considering it did not follow the PDP process but was rushed through by ex co-chairs in one of the most controversial ways ever. In fact AFRINIC cautioned that such a policy would lead to large resource members with millions of IPv4 addresses to transfer out of the region, case in point, CIL. In the history of the AFRINIC PDP, no policy proposal has been rushed through multiple versions in the span of 3 months like the self-serving *resource transfer policy*. Time is everything and we can all now witness why. *AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04 | 5 October 2020 Changes AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT03 | 21 Sept 2020 ChangesAFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT02 | 13 Aug 2020 Changes* AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT01 | 30 Oct 2019 The implementation of such a dangerous resource transfer policy would benefit *LARUS* further as per this article titled "*Gold investment opportunities in the Information Age: IPv4 address has unlimited potential*" Take time and read the motive here *https://www.larus.net/news/p/441 <https://www.larus.net/news/p/441> * Cheers, *Noah* 1. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/011753.html 2. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/011887.html
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
