Pas tout à fait vrai Ronald, quand tu lis le RSA, il fait clairement recours au Bylaws et au CPM, donc prétendre que seul le RSA relie Afrinic à CI, s'est faire preuve de mauvaise fois et limité le champ d'action des autres textes qui sont bel et bien liés. Merci de relire aussi le RSA tu y apprendrais beaucoup aussi.
Bonne journée. -- Arnaud Le lun. 2 août 2021 à 03:02, Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]> a écrit : > In message <[email protected]>, > Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > > >OK, for the sake of argument, what would you have AFRINIC do to ensure > >the protection of Cloud Innovations rights in that process? > > Cloud Innovation's legal rights in the case of a breach of the terms > of the RSA by AFRINIC are fully spelled out in the text of the RSA > itself. > > I respectfully suggest that you and all of the other amateur lawyers > on this mailing list should try reading the RSA. Who knows? You might > actually learn something. > > > Regards, > rfg > > > P.S. The RSA is the one and only legally binding agreement that > creates -any- legal connection between Cloud Innovation and > AFRINIC. > > Contrary to some popular misconceptions, Cloud Innovation is *NOT* > a stockholder or shareholder of AFRINIC. Thus, I say one more time > for those who continue to deny simple reality, the RSA is the one > and only legally binding connection between the parties. Everything > else is just smoke and mirrors. > > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
