Greg Stein wrote:
<snip excellent stuff/>
> Sorry, but nominations for membership, commit status, or PMC membership
> really should be private. I absolutely will not participate in such an
> environment, and will encourage others to avoid it also. These kinds of
> discussions really don't enhance the community.

Totally agree. Every community needs a place to discuss
some limited things in private. Sure on cocoon-dev we
discuss the actual vote for a new committer in public.
However prior to that some sub-set of committers might
discuss a proposed committer off-list. Sometimes we have
said "no not yet, let us wait a while for such-and-such
reason". This is a problem because only some of the 
committers are involved. So we do need a private forum
where all project committers can discuss.

What about using CVS for this? Can only committers
checkout the "committers" module? (I see that it is
not available via ViewCVS.) If so then that makes it
a semi-private place. Each project could have their own
document (e.g. cocoon-new-committers.txt) where we discuss
via editing the file.

This also helps to keep track of various developers that
we may want to invite later. Too often i have seen people
overlooked because we have just plain forgotten to invite
them.

--David






Reply via email to