Quoting H. Nikolaus Schaller (2016-10-28 08:39:40) > Am 28.10.2016 um 01:56 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]>: >> a) refuse any non-free code, even difficult to replace soldered-on. >> b) refuse non-free runtime-loaded code executed anywhere. >> c) tolerate non-free code not affecting main CPU or its memory. >> d) Tolerate non-free code. >> >> I believe FSF is in the b) camp,and Debian is in the c) camp (and >> Debian+non-free is in d) camp). [...] > It would even be acceptable if some firmware blob from Debian non-free > would stored in some ROM during production and injected into the WiFi > chip autonomously by some hardware (additional microcontroller) [1]. > As long as there is no connection from the SoC to modify this firmware > RMS would have been fine with it.
Right - hence my disntinction between "runtime-loaded" or not. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/community http://www.tinkerphones.org
