> In my opinion, the SE series compacts were BUTT UGLY!

Ah, so it comes down to aesthetics.

This is obviously a matter of taste. All the compact Macs look
pretty similar to my eyes, and the "racing stripes" on the SE and
SE/30 are a pretty standard way of hiding ventilation.

But for me the compact line ended when it quit improving. After
the SE/30, the Classic and Classic II were more like nostalgic
reflections of the original Mac than a successor to the SE/30...
none of the compacts had enough expansion capability to really
worry about, especially when Apple changed the PDS slot after the
SE/30 so new internal expansion devices couldn't be used in it.
But going back to a 16-bit data bus was such an appallingly cynical
move that I was stunned. What was Apple thinking of?

The Color Classic with its "welding mask" fascia is not even worth
talking about.

Both the SE and the Classic were "houses on a small lot". They have
the same floor plan, they have virtually the same design. But for
some reason all the doors in the "Classic" house are half-size...


-- 
Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>.

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>


---------------------------------------------------------------
iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com
---------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to