On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 17:11 +0200, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> On 07/05/2007 05:05 PM Kore Nordmann wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 17:53 +0300, Kirill Subbotin wrote:
> 
> >> Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> 
> >>> Just for curiosity: Why are you using such an EBNF-like format instead
> >>> of a standardized way for describing XML formats, for example
> >>> XML-Schema? We need that later, anyway, so it sounds logical to me to
> >>> use it right from the start. Or am I wrong?
> >> The reasons were that schemas are harder to read, and too many things were 
> >> unclear to
> >> create it. So I've decided to use simplified form to get more responses on 
> >> issues.
> >> (but even in this case I'm getting not very much of them)
> >> But now I'm going to create a real scheme, as anyway there is not much 
> >> feedback.
> 
> > In this case you may want to consider using the compact syntax from
> > RelaxNG, which es imho really easy to read:
> 
> > http://relaxng.org/compact-tutorial-20030326.html
> 
> While this discussion does not really belong to this thread: We should
> standardize the way we want to specify XML formats. I still insist on
> XML-Schema, since it is a W3C recommendation. The short format of
> RelaxNG might be a bit easier to read/write, but it is not an official
> standard, or am I wrong?

"The RELAX NG specifications have been developed within OASIS by the
RELAX NG Technical Committeee. RELAX NG is being developed into an
International Standard (ISO/IEC 19757-2) by ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG1; it is
currently at the final stage of standardization."

But afaik it is not directly related to the w3c in some way, but beeing
an OASIS standard and becoming an ISO standard should make it usable for
us.

I personally like the format for its simplicity, but could also live
with XML-Schema.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vennlig hilsen
 
Kore Nordmann (GPG: 0xDDC70BBB)
eZ Components Developer
eZ systems Headquaters

tel +49 (0) 231-9742-7750 | fax +49 (0) 231-9742-7751
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ systems | ez.no

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
Components mailing list
Components@lists.ez.no
http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components

Reply via email to