Derick Rethans wrote: > I've done a bit of research, and we can't use the "simple" version here, > as libxml can not use that for validation. The leaves us with either > XML Schema or RelaxNG (normal). I tried trang on our linguist files, and > the results for both schemas can be found as attachments. (Also the > corresponding .rnc).
I think the question here is what to use for discussions in the list. RelaxNG is good as an internal format for components, but the most human-readable are DTD and compact RelaxNG. So probably we could discuss it in these formats and then convert to RelaxNG for usage. -- Kirill Subbotin Software Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ Systems | ez.no -- Components mailing list Components@lists.ez.no http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
