On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Kore Nordmann wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 17:11 +0200, Tobias Schlitt wrote: > > On 07/05/2007 05:05 PM Kore Nordmann wrote: > > > > > In this case you may want to consider using the compact syntax from > > > RelaxNG, which es imho really easy to read: > > > > > http://relaxng.org/compact-tutorial-20030326.html > > > > While this discussion does not really belong to this thread: We should > > standardize the way we want to specify XML formats. I still insist on > > XML-Schema, since it is a W3C recommendation. The short format of > > RelaxNG might be a bit easier to read/write, but it is not an official > > standard, or am I wrong? > > "The RELAX NG specifications have been developed within OASIS by the > RELAX NG Technical Committeee. RELAX NG is being developed into an > International Standard (ISO/IEC 19757-2) by ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG1; it is > currently at the final stage of standardization." > > But afaik it is not directly related to the w3c in some way, but beeing > an OASIS standard and becoming an ISO standard should make it usable for > us.
I just found this: http://thaiopensource.com/relaxng/trang.html Interesting bit "Trang can also infer a schema from one or more example XML documents." regards, Derick -- Components mailing list Components@lists.ez.no http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
