On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Kore Nordmann wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 15:58 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Kore Nordmann wrote: > > > > > > > "The RELAX NG specifications have been developed within OASIS by > > > > the RELAX NG Technical Committeee. RELAX NG is being developed > > > > into an International Standard (ISO/IEC 19757-2) by ISO/IEC > > > > JTC1/SC34/WG1; it is currently at the final stage of > > > > standardization." > > > > I've done a bit of research, and we can't use the "simple" version > > here, as libxml can not use that for validation. The leaves us with > > either XML Schema or RelaxNG (normal). I tried trang on our linguist > > files, and the results for both schemas can be found as attachments. > > (Also the corresponding .rnc). > > > > XML Schema is quite harder to read, even more if things get more > > complex. I would therefore suggest to use RelaxNG as our schema > > definition language. > > > > Let's vote on this: +1 for RelaxNG. > > +1 for RelaxNG (Surprise! Surprise!) > > And > > +1 for RelaxNG-c for discussions.
I think this is a very good idea. Any against? regards, -- Derick Rethans eZ components Product Manager eZ systems | http://ez.no -- Components mailing list Components@lists.ez.no http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
