Dave Dyer wrote: > Arguing whether method "A" or method "B" rates a program more > correctly is really close to arguing how many angels can dance > on the head of a Pin. Ratings, at best, are based on mathematical > models with many simplifying assumptions. Ratings are not reality. > Nobody really believes ratings are 100% "right on the money" accurate.
But it's silly not to use the most correct method possible. Ratings are "a very useful approximation to reality" and you might as well get as close to that reality as you can. - Don > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
