Let me check CGOS statistics based on relatively evenly match  opponents
and I will filter out players that are pretty weak.  Then I'll present
the data.

CGOS is not really a democracy, but I do care about the wishes of the
program authors.   So after I show some data,  if it's highly in favor
of white I would like to hear from those opposed and those in favor of
going to 6.5 komi.    I am interested also in HOW opposed or HOW much in
favor you are.   But let's wait for the data first.

- Don




On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 01:09 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote:
> Maybe we could just do a vote?
> 
> Erik
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 22:43 +0200, Erik van der Werf wrote:
> >> > The only reason I would favor one over the other
> >> > is if it turned out that in "practical play" the games ended up
> >> closer.
> >> > For instance if black won a 53% at 6.5 komi and white wins 51% at
> >> 7.5
> >> > komi, I would favor 7.5 because it kept the scores close.
> >>
> >> Last week I was told that, with 7.5 komi against itself, Mogo wins
> >> over 60% as White. Also against my own program I have much better
> >> chances when playing White.
> >
> > I really don't trust this after doing the Leela experiments.
> >
> > Also, I studied this a while back with CGOS data and saw a very tiny
> > advantage for white, not much.  This was even when I filtered the weaker
> > opponents out.  I suppose I could do this again but it doesn't seem to
> > prove anything.
> >
> >> As programs become stronger the advantage for one side with fractional
> >> komi will inevitably become totally unbalanced. At some point we will
> >> approach 100% and then I rather have that go to the first player. The
> >> only fair alternative is to use integer komi.
> >
> > I think we have a long time for that to happen.    When that day comes,
> > 9x9 will be like checkers is now,  you have to play 10 or 20 draws just
> > to get 1 or 2 wins.
> >
> > - Don
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > computer-go mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
> >

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to