And now after about 11,000 games we are within 1 standard deviation and the score is very close to 50% so I have confidence that we have 2 functionally equivalent bots.
I might now look into building one in the Vala and/or genie language. - Don On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 08:39 -0400, Don Dailey wrote: > The C reference bot indeed had a simple bug. Everything was fine except > for when the final move choice was made, I forgot to check for eye. > > I am surprised it played as strongly as it did because it seems like it > would have always filled eyes, but the logic of not selecting a move > that has no playouts associated with it kicked in. So it ended up > being roughly only 15 ELO weaker. That explains why the other > statistics seemed to match perfectly, there was nothing wrong with the > playouts. > > It was outside 4 standard deviations after many thousand games. Now > it is within 2 SD after about 8000 games. I'm going to let it run for > a few more thousand games and see if this continues to hold up because > the javabot is scoring 51.01 percent, just barely within 2 standard > deviations. > > - Don > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
