On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Michael Williams <
michaelwilliam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Fuego gets an advantage because when it plays the anchor, it is playing a
> version of itself.  That's bad for the same reason that it's bad to test
> against a version of your own program -- inflated results.  But I don't
> think it's a big deal.  What about using both Fuego and Mogo as anchors?
>  Don't they both satisfy those requirements?


Ok,  I understand.   I cannot be too anal about this since this would be an
issue with any program I choose.

I would prefer not to have multiple different anchors simply due to the
extra complexity.  I would have to calibrate both of them,  find servers to
run both of them on,  and basically all the issue are doubled.    Mogo is
also a problem because it's not open source as far as I know.   I want there
to be this kind of transparency.

 I don't mind running multiple copies of identical anchors though.
Anyway,  we could decide later to do something like this,  no need to decide
now.

- Don




>
>
>
>
> Don Dailey wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Hiroshi Yamashita 
>> <y...@bd.mbn.or.jp<mailto:
>> y...@bd.mbn.or.jp>> wrote:
>>
>>        I restarted the 19x19 server.
>>
>>
>>    Thank you. I started my bot.
>>
>>
>>        I'm thinking about making some specified version of fuego
>>
>>
>>    I think using Fuego for anchor is good idea.
>>    One problem is maybe latest Fuego will be overrated from
>>    weak Fuego anchor.
>>
>>
>> Can you explain this?  I don't understand what you are saying.
>>
>> - Don
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    Regards,
>>    Hiroshi Yamashita
>>
>>
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    computer-go mailing list
>>    computer-go@computer-go.org <mailto:computer-go@computer-go.org>
>>    http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> computer-go mailing list
>> computer-go@computer-go.org
>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to