It is working.   That is pretty odd that it would not get scheduled.

As for the new server,  I want to do a test and then a switchover soon, the
code is in a state where it is usable.    It will not schedule the same
pairing twice in a row unless those are the only 2 players.

I do not want to put it up until I can be "highly available" in case there
are troubles.  This weekend I will be out Fri-Sun and I'll be away today and
tomorrow - so it will be next week.   But I'm eager to get it going and I
hope a lot of people will help me test it.

- Don




On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:18 AM, David Fotland <[email protected]>wrote:

> Is cgos working?  It tried putting Many faces on 19x19 a few days ago.  It
> logged it on, and told it there would be a new match later, but there were
> two programs on and it kept playing them against each other over and over
> without scheduling ManyFaces, so after a few hours I killed it.
>
> David
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:computer-go-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Lavergne
> > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 12:22 AM
> > To: computer-go
> > Subject: Re: [computer-go] Re: fuego strength
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:39:05PM -0400, Jason House wrote:
> > > That raises an interesting point. I've also put bots up in a setup and
> > > forget scenario, but inevitably the bit is off of CGOS within a few
> days
> > > and I had no idea when it went down.
> > >
> > > What's the right way to solve this issue so such altruistic bots can be
> > > more easilly maintained? This may also help the anchor absence issue
> too.
> >
> > If cgosclient not only stall but really crash (due to itself, your
> > program or more probably a network failure) you can just put it in
> > script with a loop :
> >
> > runme.sh:
> >       #!/bin/sh
> >       while true
> >       do
> >               cgosclient
> >       done
> >
> > I've done this in the past and it works well. I suppose you
> > can do something similar on Windows, but as I know almost anything about
> > windows I can't you for it.
> >
> > I recomand putting a 'mail' in the loop for sending you informations
> > about the crash. And to be gently with the server, adding a 'sleep x' in
> > order to wait a bit before reconnecting.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Lavergne                    "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter
> >                                      necessitatem." (Guillaume d'Ockham)
> > [email protected]                            http://oniros.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > computer-go mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to