This looks like GnuGo at level 1. Note things like filling at Q15, which GnuGo 
would not do on level 10 or higher.

Cheers,
David G Doshay

ddos...@mac.com





> On 3, Nov 2015, at 8:31 AM, Marc Landgraf <mahrgel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> then again, Gnugo donked that game pretty badly. 
> Showing one game, where Gnugo just throws away the entire top before move 50 
> is not really telling about the overall strength, imho. Gnugo repeats the 
> failure by suiciding the top right as well. 
> What is shown after is hard to evaluate, considering the score difference. 
> The fact that the FB Bot prefers to play random moves in the center instead 
> of removing the possible Ko in the lower left later is weird, but may be due 
> to it's gigantic lead at this point.
> 
> Another interesting thing to note is, that the values shown on the right do 
> not always correspond to the played moves. E.g. at move S17 (killing the top 
> right) actually S16 had been give a higher score then the played S17
> 
> 2015-11-03 17:22 GMT+01:00 Aja Huang <ajahu...@google.com 
> <mailto:ajahu...@google.com>>:
> Yes I checked the game. The agent looks pretty strong. It crushed GnuGo 
> easily.
> 
> Aja
> 
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Rémi Coulom <remi.cou...@free.fr 
> <mailto:remi.cou...@free.fr>> wrote:
> Can a strong player look at the video and give impressions about the game?
> 
> On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM, Petr Baudis wrote:
>    Hi!
> 
>    Facebook is working on a Go AI too, now:
> 
>         https://www.facebook.com/Engineering/videos/10153621562717200/ 
> <https://www.facebook.com/Engineering/videos/10153621562717200/>
>         https://code.facebook.com/posts/1478523512478471 
> <https://code.facebook.com/posts/1478523512478471>
>         
> http://www.wired.com/2015/11/facebook-is-aiming-its-ai-at-go-the-game-no-computer-can-crack/
>  
> <http://www.wired.com/2015/11/facebook-is-aiming-its-ai-at-go-the-game-no-computer-can-crack/>
> 
> The way it's presented triggers my hype alerts, but nevertheless:
> does anyone know any details about this?  Most interestingly, how
> strong is it?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org <mailto:Computer-go@computer-go.org>
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go 
> <http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org <mailto:Computer-go@computer-go.org>
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go 
> <http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to