Am 23.07.2010 um 21:54 schrieb Raymond Wold:

> On 23.07.2010 02:12, Stefan Kaitschick wrote:
>> Why should the worst case be the most interesting?
>> In a program of this complexity worst case isn't the "true" strength of the 
>> program.
>> Worst case is basically a bug.
> 
> Given enough time, even an "AI" that chooses entirely randomly from the legal 
> moves available will get a win against the best human.

A simple bash script is enough to achieve that:

  sleep 10000000000

I don't think any human will live long enough to beat this.


Regards

David

_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to