Christoph Birk wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Matthew Woodcraft wrote: > >(Unlike what others are reporting, I do see a big improvement from RAVE > >even with uniform random playouts.)
> I think we agree. I see a big improvement with AMAF (not RAVE) > with uniform playouts (no UCT) too. > But once I use UCT the improvement of AMAF (not RAVE) is only > minimal. > I use the terms > AMAF: all move as first (after the simulations) > RAVE: use the AMAF values to seed the (UCT) tree search I saw a big improvement from RAVE over UCT-with-uniform-playouts. I never really tried to tune the non-RAVE implementation, though, so it's possible that I had a poor choice of the exploration coefficient and RAVE meant that it didn't matter. -M- _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
