Many thanks
On 30/12/2010 10:34, Petr Baudis wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:26:49AM +0000, Robert Finking wrote:
Hi David,
Many thanks for sharing this info with us. I am not a strong Go
player and have a question which I suspect many people on this list
could answer:
On 30/12/2010 08:09, David Fotland wrote:
...
hand tuned. There are rules for not filling eyes, not making self Atari
(unless it is a good self Atari), and avoiding other kinds of bad moves.
When is self atari a good move?
E.g. when you are filling dead eyespace:
| . O O O .
| X X X X O
| O O . X O
| O a O X .
+----------
a is selfatari, but good idea for w to play.
Another examples of interesting selfataris may be one-stone throw-ins to
falsify eyes or setting up snapbacks.
See also
http://repo.or.cz/w/pachi.git/blob/HEAD:/tactics/selfatari.c
as an example of rather complex code to evaluate selfataris. The code
itself is probably not very legible, but the comments contain a lot of
examples.
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
