Petri, > Well this gives a biased solution. Wrong sample so to speak. Fuego will > not create complex semeais and har read ishi-no-shita nakade shapes i.e > opponent that puts no pressure to known problems . So you prove that > agains opponent who does not play like human you do scale.
I completely agree and this is precisely why I said we need stronger bots to test further. > But It would scale better if there were better algorithm in place and > part of that extra CPU would be used there. [...] So I don't think that > we get to 6 Dan EGF (8-9 Dan KGS?) with current programs just adding > memory and CPU. I also agree there, 9d KGS will be hard. But it will be reached sooner than most people think, partly by algorithmic improvements and partly thanks to Moore's law. Go is a perfect application for many cores, we will be able to take advantage of 256-cores machines that are coming soon. This will not be enough, but it should get at least 2 stones and algorithmic improvements will do the rest. Jean-loup
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
