Thanks Terry's clarification. Indeed, I misunderstood what Olivier meant. Hope 
it didn't mislead any one.

By the way, Don, you know about chess more than us. I wonder if chess is close 
to be solved now? Already 14 years since Deep Blue defeated Kasparov....

Aja
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Don Dailey 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 9:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [Computer-go] 19x19 opening books


  Better terminology is, "approach perfect play" which I think is what was 
meant when someone claimed "weakly solved."
  Of course that is also an ambiguous phrase,  but it probably captures the 
intent of the statement more accurately.  


  Suppose that at 6.5 komi black wins.   If a computer wins the majority of the 
games as black against humans we have evidence that the program is very strong 
but we still don't know how strong the human players are so this does not imply 
that the program is nearly perfect.  


  However,  if you take a candidate program that you believe is close to 
perfect and it wins 95% (or some arbitrarily high percentage)  of it's games 
against itself when playing black (with 6.5 komi) then you have a much stronger 
belief that you are approaching perfect play.   Since this is no proof,  you 
cannot  make any claims about the game being almost solved. 


  Of course if such a strong player is based on massive opening book 
engineering,  choosing a different komi probably invalidates the book work you 
have done so any claims much be based on a specific komi unless all reckoning 
and play is based on maximizing points on the board,  certainly a much more 
difficult task.  


  Don














  On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Álvaro Begué <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Aja <[email protected]> wrote:
    > For Zen and CrazyStone, they might not be interested on 9x9, because 19x19
    > is their arena. Mogo is maybe the best candidate. In the TAAI
    > conference last year in Taiwan, Olivier stated that Mogo will solve (or
    > weakly solve?) 9x9 by winning 4 out of 7 games against some top 
professional
    > player.
    >
    > Aja


    Ein? That's not what solving a game means.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solved_game

    Ąlvaro.



    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Brian Sheppard
    > To: [email protected] ; 'Aja'
    > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 12:01 AM
    > Subject: RE: [Computer-go] 19x19 opening books
    >
    >>I think 9x9 go, even though compared to chess in complexity,  is still 
more
    >> complex than chess and that the book will have a little less impact,
    >>  although still a lot.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > My projection is the opposite: I think that 9x9 will be "played out" 
within
    > 5 years. Not weakly solved, exactly, but close to it. Zen and CrazyStone
    > have the ability to start on that project already.
    >
    >
    >
    > My impression is that the opening books are routinely worth a few hundred
    > rating points in 9x9 CGOS.
    >
    >
    >
    > I would cite Valkyria, which has a version that is playing near the top of
    > the CGOS ladder most of the time. A comparable version was playing ~200
    > rating points within the last year, and I suspect that the opening book
    > knowledge that comes from its long-term memory is the dominant 
contributor.
    >
    >
    >
    > I also cite the Little Golem server, which is dominated by programs that
    > have opening books.
    >
    >
    >
    > Based on the work of Mogo and Valkyria, I suspect that if you take a 
pretty
    > good player and create a feedback system then you get a great opening 
book.
    > With an effective branching factor of maybe 2 to 3, you can get pretty far
    > into the game.
    >
    >
    >
    > Brian
    >
    >
    >

    > _______________________________________________
    > Computer-go mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
    >
    _______________________________________________
    Computer-go mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Computer-go mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to