Ingo is right. But I interpret "weakly solved" the same way Erik does: Not only do you have to provide a program that always obtains the best result in practice, but you need to be able to prove that this is always the case.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:29 AM, "Ingo Althöfer" <[email protected]> wrote: > Proper komi will be integral, > and the perfect result will be a draw. > > Ingo. > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:25:24 +0800 >> Von: "Aja" <[email protected]> >> An: "Erik van der Werf" <[email protected]> >> CC: [email protected] >> Betreff: Re: [Computer-go] 19x19 opening books > >> Thanks Erik. And I am confused. >> >> If the perfect play of 7x7 Go, with proper komi, is Black's win. Then >> doesn't a Go program "weakly solve" 7x7 Go if it is unbeatable as Black? >> >> This is what the definition of "weakly solve" states, >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solved_game >> More typically, solving a game means providing an algorithm that secures a >> win for one player, or a draw for either, against any possible moves by >> the >> opponent, from the beginning of the game. >> >> Aja >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Computer-go mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > -- > Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir > belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
