>The CS3 should be faster when it's completely native. CS3 is remarkably slower than CS2 even for actions that should not require much CPU time. Adobe's programmers get worse and worse as time goes on.
>If I were doing volume photo processing or video, I'd get the MacBook >Pro or Mac Pro and hold out for a native CS3 with bugs ironed out Caution on MacBook Pros. Unlike the durable MacBook, the MacBook Pro is very likely to break, even from a small fall and even if in a soft case. For photo/video work your best bet is a MacPro (tower) because it will be easy to upgrade. ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
