> Can you show us one instance where a monopoly did not give us high
> prices, low innovation, and few options?

Certainly not the Postal Service.

It's not a monopoly.  It's one entertainment option among many.  Saying that
XM/Sirius is a monopoly is akin to arguing that WAMU is a monopoly because
it's the only station that can broadcast at 88.5 MHz in the DC area.

If you honestly think that XM/Sirius can just jack up their prices and
reduce the channel options without their customers leaving in droves, then
I've given you way too much credit over the years.

> The problem is particularly critical in this area because media
> consolidation threatens democracy. Take a lesson from Italy where one
> man
> gained control of all the networks and used that to elect himself
> president. His corrupt government then changed laws so he could not be
> prosecuted for the many crimes he committed in the process.

Mel Karmazin and Hugh Panero are in charge of what exactly?  Other than
their respective companies, that is.

> I'm sure Jeff would be perfectly happy if the US were run by one big
> corporation (probably with Bill Gates at its head).

Of course not; that's just silly.  I'd want TJ Rodgers to be in charge.


*************************************************************************
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*************************************************************************

Reply via email to