I think that it was settled decades ago: no substantiated risk. Thank you, Mark Snyder -----Original Message----- From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rlsimon Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 5:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [CGUYS] US is access loser
I'm on the Planning/Zoning Board of our town. Recently we reviewed an app to put up a tower along the main road on a piece of land behing fire company #2 with good rental $$ for the town. I objected given it is kiddycorner across the street from the new school. They brought in a big gun (prof of engineering and physics from PennState who has over 100 pub on his resume about rf from cell towers, etc.) who gave a very detailed explanation with charts&graphs showing the decrement of the signal strength and the dependency on the elevation and distance from the tower, etc. It passed. That was last year. No tower is growing yet. I think the evidence (including the fat packet provided) is the worries about that are bunk and junk science. I wonder if it is a settled issue or if there is still any doubt?? ************************************************************************ * ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** ************************************************************************ * ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
