>Which reads as "don't try and compete with Google." I suppose then >that since you disapprove of their competing with the non-evil (yet) >behemoth, you would approve of an MS move to strong-arm computer >manufacturers to *not* include Chrome on their installs, as Google >would like the mfrs to do?
No, I do not see Google requiring the use of Chrome to access their services. I only know of one browser that is required for accessing certain web services, and that is IE. Google competes by having a much better product. If MS had a much better product they would not have to use strong-arm tactics or try to put Yahoo! out of business to raise their meager market share for search. You asked for an example of MS blacklisting and I provided it. Can you now provide an example of Google dropping features in order to herd traffic to one of their underperforming properties? ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
