> Intel's management remarked that Apple was all over > them before switching to their processors and pushed > them to do some things differently. Verizon passed > on the iPhone because Apple as "too intrusive."
So they asked for stuff (MS does too, not that this would make any difference to you). That doesn't respond to the question, which you have now failed to answer twice: Does Apple analyze every line of code in every component it uses, including the CPUs, or not? It's a yes or no question. > What's your point? It's very simple: If the answer to the question is "no" (as, of course, it is), then your entire argument comes apart at the seams. You are saying that MS is incompetent because it didn't do something that *nobody* does--including beloved Apple. If MS is incompetent for this, then so must be Apple. Not to mention Toshiba and the others whose MP3 players also crashed on New Year's eve. > Does it really matter which it is? So, you made an accusation against MS that was clearly wrong, but it doesn't matter. OK. The question is, will you -ever- admit that you were wrong about -anything- you say regarding MS? ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
