> Statements that include terms like "every," "all," "none," "always," or > "never" usually have the answer built into the question. Your > ridiculous, stacked-deck question is unworthy.
As Mike notes, you have finally answered the question, rather circuitously, with "No, Apple does not check every line of code in every third-party component." If you admit (finally) that no one checks -every- line of code in -every- component, then you cannot classify MS as incompetent because it failed to check -this- one line of code in -this- one component. There simply is no logic in your position that no one completely validates every component, yet MS is clueless because it failed to do exactly that. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
