That would be a 'no'. On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Tom Piwowar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >So they asked for stuff (MS does too, not that this would make any > >difference to you). That doesn't respond to the question, which you have > now > >failed to answer twice: Does Apple analyze every line of code in every > >component it uses, including the CPUs, or not? It's a yes or no question. > > Statements that include terms like "every," "all," "none," "always," or > "never" usually have the answer built into the question. Your ridiculous, > stacked-deck question is unworthy. > > You received a reasonable answer that sharply contrasts the degree of due > diligence, but you prefer FUD and hyperbole. This seems to be one of > those rare "always" situations. > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > -- Make sure you support your local CarbonONset programs! ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
