> Yep, it actually seems to be improving Windows by making it more > adjustable > by the end user.
Yes, change is good and it may, in fact, be a big winner in terms of Windows sales, but how much of this is utterly wasted capital in the form of the baker's window? If nothing else, a whole lotta lawyers and law firms got wealthy(er) from US and EU actions. Is there really that much to be gained from being able to deactivate certain applications? A reduced profile security-wise, yes, but it may be that enough of those applications share enough code that little is gained in that form. Is there really any significant consumer demand for an OS to do this? ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
