> > We should document on the wiki the steps for contributing patches, like we do > for Lucene, et. al. This generally helps and gives us something to point > people to in the future. Also, if we get a few patches from one or two > people on a regular basis, we should look to add them as committers > (discussion on specific people should be handled on the project PMC list). >
I don't think anybody has hit the "regular contribution" threshold, but I'll certainly signal when somebody passes it. I found the Lucene patch contribution page, but it's in the wiki. Any preference for the site vs. the wiki for this? Probably process stuff goes in wiki? Karl
