hellekin: > *** I understand. So I propose this discussion goes on to the > Socialswarm mailing-list alone, and when we have something to > announce, we can use the GNU consensus. Otherwise, it mixes up > the goals and means.
The exclusionary approach proposed by carlo von lynX also does not seem to be aligned with the goals and means of Socialswarm: "Oh no, not another social media project trying to save humanity? That’s what we thought. There are plenty of people working on that already. The only problem is: They are not working together. That is why we want to build a platform to connect us all: • users • coders • the different projects" http://socialswarm.net/?lang=en But my main question are the goals and means of the proposed 30C3 assembly. Maybe it makes sense to create an alternative, more open proposal? BTW: The proposal text created by carlo von lynX currently suggests: "Contact us on ircs://psyced.org:6667/youbroketheinternet Or join our #youbroketheinternet working group on RetroShare". Maybe the discussion regarding the youbroketheinternet assembly proposal should simply take place there? That would also help to ensure that "legacy"-projects are kept out. Cheers, Andreas
