carlo von lynX: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:28:38PM -0300, hellekin wrote: >> *** We need to distinguish two vectors in our working group. >> >> One is the hardcore P2P "next generation" that focuses on GNUnet and >> peer-to-peer solutions ; and the other is the "transitional" that >> focuses on how to go from here to there, including contemplating >> alternate paths, such as patching hopeless protocols, or seeking to >> reform the existing nightmarish hell of a reality. > > No, we don't need to make that distinction. At the last meeting > there was a clear majority who only wants to get something solid > off the ground and doesn't care for legacy patchwork.
Was there a vote on that? What does clear majority mean (60% of the participants? participants representing 90% of users?) ? Can you name those projects represented in that meeting which do not care about improving the situation for users of what you call "legacy"-software and -standards ? Cheers, Andreas
