IMHO, we can remove.
2008/3/10, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > There are some other branches residing in Continuum SVN. Should we > remove any (or all) of the following if they are not in active > development? I know (id-refactor and key-based-refactor can go) > > # continuum-acegi > # continuum-site_1.1 > # gbuild > # id-refactor > # key-based-refactor > # osworkflow-integration > # release-integration > > Cheers, > Rahul > > > Brett Porter wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on a > > branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each, and > > none merged to the other. > > > > Can I suggest we merge all branch changes to trunk, rename trunk to > > 1.2-SNAPSHOT, and the branch to continuum-1.1.x (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) and use > > that for bugfixes only? > > > > WDYT? > > > > > - Brett > > > > -- > > Brett Porter > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > > >
