The branches have been removed except for 'continuum-site_1.1' which had some updates a few months ago. If this is not required please feel free to remove.


Olivier Lamy wrote:
IMHO, we can remove.

2008/3/10, Rahul Thakur<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
  There are some other branches residing in Continuum SVN. Should we
  remove any (or all) of the following if they are not in active
  development? I know (id-refactor and key-based-refactor can go)

  # continuum-acegi
  # continuum-site_1.1
  # gbuild
  # id-refactor
  # key-based-refactor
  # osworkflow-integration
  # release-integration


  Brett Porter wrote:
  >  Hi,
  >  I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on a
  >  branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each, and
  >  none merged to the other.
  >  Can I suggest we merge all branch changes to trunk, rename trunk to
  >  1.2-SNAPSHOT, and the branch to continuum-1.1.x (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) and use
  >  that for bugfixes only?
  >  WDYT?

  >  - Brett
  >  --
  >  Brett Porter

Reply via email to