The branches have been removed except for 'continuum-site_1.1' which had
some updates a few months ago. If this is not required please feel free
to remove.
Rahul
Olivier Lamy wrote:
IMHO, we can remove.
2008/3/10, Rahul Thakur<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There are some other branches residing in Continuum SVN. Should we
remove any (or all) of the following if they are not in active
development? I know (id-refactor and key-based-refactor can go)
# continuum-acegi
# continuum-site_1.1
# gbuild
# id-refactor
# key-based-refactor
# osworkflow-integration
# release-integration
Cheers,
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on a
> branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each, and
> none merged to the other.
>
> Can I suggest we merge all branch changes to trunk, rename trunk to
> 1.2-SNAPSHOT, and the branch to continuum-1.1.x (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) and use
> that for bugfixes only?
>
> WDYT?
> - Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
