On 23/10/17 21:13, Tom Pantelis wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk > <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: > > On 23/10/17 14:37, Tom Pantelis wrote: > > Or we get infrautils promoted to "mature" to get around the red tape. > > What would that take? ... > > A Graduation Review. Unfortunately > https://www.opendaylight.org/project-lifecycle-releases > <https://www.opendaylight.org/project-lifecycle-releases> disappeared > somewhere (Casey, do you know where?), but it includes things like: > - clear scope > - history of following the mature release cycle > etc. > > > If it disappeared then how important can it be now :) ... These rules > and bureaucracy were put into place a while ago when ODL had a lot more > participation. Along with Michael, I question whether it's really > relevant anymore...
It is part of our governance and how OpenDaylight is set up. If things are not relevant anymore, then our governance needs to change -- and that is something the Board/TSC have to tackle *first*, we cannot just start ignoring it. I do not agree with this particular piece being irrelevant -- it is just not convenient. I think everyone knows where I stand on convenience vs. long-term sustainability :) and that stance is held supported by many scars. Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
