Just commenting on code in a mature project depending on code in non-mature project & nothing else:
I don't think it was written in the project lifecycle rules that some code in a mature project cannot depend on some code in incubation or a bootstrap project. By that logic we would never be able to have the following type of new functionality added in ODL: - that some mature offset 1 or 2 projects desire - the new functionality either deserves a new offset 0 project or logically needs to go into an existing offset 0 incubation/bootstrap project Also there is at least one instance in ODL where we have some mature projects (NetVirt, VTN, GBP to name a few) depending on non-mature project like OpenFlow Plugin (which is in bootstrap state). On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> wrote: > On 23/10/17 21:13, Tom Pantelis wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk > > <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: > > > > On 23/10/17 14:37, Tom Pantelis wrote: > > > Or we get infrautils promoted to "mature" to get around the red > tape. > > > What would that take? ... > > > > A Graduation Review. Unfortunately > > https://www.opendaylight.org/project-lifecycle-releases > > <https://www.opendaylight.org/project-lifecycle-releases> > disappeared > > somewhere (Casey, do you know where?), but it includes things like: > > - clear scope > > - history of following the mature release cycle > > etc. > > > > > > If it disappeared then how important can it be now :) ... These rules > > and bureaucracy were put into place a while ago when ODL had a lot more > > participation. Along with Michael, I question whether it's really > > relevant anymore... > > It is part of our governance and how OpenDaylight is set up. If things > are not relevant anymore, then our governance needs to change -- and > that is something the Board/TSC have to tackle *first*, we cannot just > start ignoring it. > > I do not agree with this particular piece being irrelevant -- it is just > not convenient. > > I think everyone knows where I stand on convenience vs. long-term > sustainability :) and that stance is held supported by many scars. > > Regards, > Robert > > > _______________________________________________ > controller-dev mailing list > controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev > >
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
