On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 13:00:51 +0200, Helge Hielscher wrote:
> Frank Griffin wrote:
>
>> Umm, Ok, here's another obvious newbie question. Is there a link that
>> describes the voting process for Cooker (Bugzilla) bugs. I've just
>> been submitting bug reports in the (probably naive) belief that they
>> would be routed to the category owners and acted upon according to
>> whatever priority scheme is dictated by Mandrake's internal business
>> practices. However, comments on those bugs have hinted at some sort
>> of voting practice. As far as I knew, the only voting was on Club
>> packages. How do you vote for bugs (and what is the protocol of doing
>> so) ?
>
> Response on bug reports:
> I looks like there is no scheme of who is looking after bugreports.
> There are many bugs which were reported during the 9.1 beta which are
> still uncovered. Why should I post a bug if I know no one will be
> looking at it?
Because if you don't post a bug, you can be sure it won't be fixed at
all..
Just complaining "XXXX sucks, it doesn't work" without reporting anything
is not constructive at all..
Yes, there are a lot of bugs and all can't be closed because either:
-infos are insufficent for reproducing the bug ("I doesn't work..")
-hardware related problem, impossible to reproduce here
-complex application bug which can only be resolved by apps authors (that
is why I ask people to submit bugs on mozilla.org or gnome.org when it is
not a Mdk issue)..
--
Frederic Crozat
MandrakeSoft
