On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Giuseppe Ghib� wrote:

> Stew Benedict wrote:
> 
> > Guiseppe?  Seems like any approach to this change creates more issues than 
> > it fixes.
> > 
> 
> IMHO is not the approach that create issues, but such issues already
> were existing before (like kmail who wrote in $HOME/Mail); the only
> difference is that such issues weren't discussed all together
> in mailing list before.
> 
> Current squirrelmail (as horde) doesn't expect ~/whatever. It have an 
> empty mailsubdir, like any other existing (even non Linux) mail client. 
> That's mean that if imapd uses $HOME/Mail, or $HOME/mail as mail folder 
> prefix, it will use it (in a trasparent way, i.e. only see folders 
> inside $HOME/mail). If the imapd uses $HOME as happened before 
> imap-2002d-6mdk (except imap-2002d-3mdk), then squirrel will use
> $HOME, and each squirrel user would have access to the $HOME system
> files (and he can provide a mail folder prefix on a per users basis).
> 

Ok, I thought I saw you modify some other package in parallel with the 
imapd patch add/removal, which would imply that it is somehow dependent on 
the imapd setup.

So, I'm pretty much at a loss as to what to do.  The only person I see 
raising an issue with the default is Guiseppe.  Any change proposed raises 
N other issues, and a number of people just want the package pitched 
altogether.

-- 
Stew Benedict

--
MandrakeSoft


Reply via email to