> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 11:13:21PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote: > >i updated your src.rpms to LVM1-1.0.7 LVM2-1.00.06 & dm-1.00.04 > >(hopefully i didn't add some bugs) > > Thank you, actually i had in mind of changing the layout again, putting > binaries in /sbin/lvm1 and /sbin/lvm2, since lvm2 tools check for name > and cannot be invoked when called lvm2-toolname.
why would you need to call them with lvm1-toolname or lvm2-toolname, you made such a good solution with the alternatives. it shouldn't be allowed to be able to call lvm1 & lvm2 tools at the same time > >and the patches are against 2.4.22-rc2-mdk7 (may be latter 2.4.22-1mdk :) > >) > >http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/mdk-cook/probably_broken/dev-mapper_for_2.4.22-rc2q7/ resynced against 2.4.22.1mdk patches are already available (but are not yet tested , although no compile problems with all i386 kernels :) ) > > > >i'm still not sure about the fls(), did you have in mind smth like the > >attachment ZY19... > yes, but i won't swear it is correct, what about asking Joe Thornber, or > someone else from sistina? i just sent an e-mail to dm-devel, lvm-devel & Joe Thornber let's wait a bit :) best, svetljo -- COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test -------------------------------------------------- 1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger! 2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualit�tssieger! 3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8. e-Post
