> >>>i'm still not sure about the fls(), did you have in mind smth like the > >>>attachment ZY19... > >> > >>yes, but i won't swear it is correct, what about asking Joe Thornber, or > >>someone else from sistina? > > > > i just sent an e-mail to dm-devel, lvm-devel & Joe Thornber > > let's wait a bit :) > > > saw the answer, Joe says that the best thing to do was what you did at > first (renaming dm fls functions to avoid conflicts). He does not say > which one is the correct implementation for fls.
OK, i'll upload the old patch, he said also that this code should go away, so hopefully soon we won't need it :) best, svetljo PS. any words from the MDK team ? Thomas would you include it ? -- COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test -------------------------------------------------- 1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger! 2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualit�tssieger! 3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8. e-Post
