> Buchan Milne wrote: >> Come on Ron, please don't be so dramatic on every problem you have, >> until you can actually provide a useful bug report. > > The degree of dramaticness has nothing to do with whether there is a > reproducible bug report.
And neither does it: -contribute any information of value that anyone can use to debug the problem -give us any reason to respect the next "Stop the presses" bug report from you. > This has occurrred three times under 9.1 and > now once under 9.2 on this one machine, which is otherwise 100% long > term totally stable. So, it's but a "9.2 disaster", but rather something you have configured on your machine. With about 6 production desktops that have run 9.1 and 9.2 for significant amounts of time, plus a few production servers (running 9.0 and 9.1) I have never seen anything like this, and it doesn't seem as if anyone else has. > I need some kind of daemon that will watch all > the time for /root/*.nnnnn file creation, but that is beyond my skill > level. Well, you could start by looking at the modification times, and if you were using the machine at the time, remember what you were doing. If not, you could look in the logs to see what ran then. > 9.2 is not yet installed on my other desktop machine, but will be soon > unless any further disasters pop up. OK, so a disaster isn't something that prevents you from using the machine as a full-time desktop? So, in future we should classify anything from you with urgent, disaster, critical etc as "minor irritation" then? Sorry, but I can't take bug reports like this seriously ... maybe you should try a different list (since this isn't the 9.2 support list).
