> Hi, > > In Bordeaux some people criticized us for delivering non-free software > like Netscape in our first CD that we label "GPL Edition" is its > standalone version. > > Now we have a (rather funny) idea : why not trying to see if it's > possible to build up a 100% GPL product? This would involve removing > anything but GPL-ized stuff, that is XFree86, apache, etc. > so you want to have a distribution that contains only GPL licensed stuff? how aobut open-sourced software? apache's license is incompatible with GPL ... > Does anyone here is interested in looking after this product? > > not if godo setuff like apache is removed. i need it ;)
- [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake distro (... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Geoffrey Lee
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Armisis Aieoln
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Pablo Saratxaga
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... David Walluck
